An open letter from pharmacists denouncing potential DH plans that would allow pharmacy technicians to supervise medicines supply has been delivered to the RPS

An open letter and corresponding petition calling on candidates for the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) presidency to oppose the potential supervision of medicines supply by pharmacy technicians has been signed by over 600 pharmacists.

Pharmacists Mike Hewitson and Ben Merriman penned the letter in response to the Department of Health’s (DH) plans to increase the scope of technicians’ responsibilities via its Rebalancing Board.

Change on the horizon

It has come to light that the board is considering allowing pharmacy technicians to legally supervise medicines supply. This is strongly opposed by many pharmacists and forms the main thrust of the letter to the Society.

The authors say that “anything other than a strong and robust opposition to these proposals by the RPS, its staff and elected officials will be seen as a betrayal by the thousands of community pharmacists in membership of the organisation and more than [two million] members of the public who signed a petition in support of community pharmacies and the service they provide.”

The sector responds

Tess Fenn, president of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians UK (APTUK), commented: “There is already strong evidence that pharmacy technicians can take on a range of roles including final accuracy checking, medicines management and pharmacy management in a controlled way and without increasing risk.”

She added that this contribution is pivotal to the future of pharmacy service provision, especially as pharmacists’ clinical role evolves. “As such, APTUK supports changes to supervision and greater delegation of tasks to pharmacy technicians as a registered professional within the pharmacy team. However, we believe that personal and organisational risk management must be in place and rigorously applied,” she continued.

Ms Fenn emphasised that pharmacy technicians “must recognise the limits of their competence and refer to a pharmacist when necessary”, and added “APTUK believes that within any proposed changes the presence of the pharmacist remains, along with overall accountability for the clinical appropriateness of medicines for patients.”

In response to the open letter, the RPS commented: “The Royal Pharmaceutical Society has always believed that a community pharmacy requires a pharmacist to be present,” adding that the Society invites “everyone in pharmacy to work with us to secure a bright future where pharmacists leading their teams in community pharmacies contribute fully to safe patient care.”

The wider picture

A Department of Health board was set up in 2013 to rebalance medicines legislation and pharmacy regulation including the decriminalision of dispensing errors, while also addressing pharmacy supervision.

Originally Published by Training Matters

Recommended

HEE survey into workforce needs

HEE is inviting community pharmacies to participate in the first ever national survey looking at training and developmen...

Dovonex ointment switched from POM to P

Dovonex Psoriasis Ointment (calcipotriol 50mcg/g) has been reclassified as a P medicine, the MHRA has announced

Popular

Schizophrenia

This CPD module provides an overview of schizophrenia.

Pharmacists could inject contraceptives

Community pharmacists could inject subcutaneous contraceptives but have concerns, research finds

Pancreatic cancer – the role of the pharmacy team

This module will help you spot potential symptoms of pancreatic cancer among pharmacy customers, to help aid early diagn...