An open letter from pharmacists denouncing potential DH plans that would allow pharmacy technicians to supervise medicines supply has been delivered to the RPS

An open letter and corresponding petition calling on candidates for the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) presidency to oppose the potential supervision of medicines supply by pharmacy technicians has been signed by over 600 pharmacists.

Pharmacists Mike Hewitson and Ben Merriman penned the letter in response to the Department of Health’s (DH) plans to increase the scope of technicians’ responsibilities via its Rebalancing Board.

Change on the horizon

It has come to light that the board is considering allowing pharmacy technicians to legally supervise medicines supply. This is strongly opposed by many pharmacists and forms the main thrust of the letter to the Society.

The authors say that “anything other than a strong and robust opposition to these proposals by the RPS, its staff and elected officials will be seen as a betrayal by the thousands of community pharmacists in membership of the organisation and more than [two million] members of the public who signed a petition in support of community pharmacies and the service they provide.”

The sector responds

Tess Fenn, president of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians UK (APTUK), commented: “There is already strong evidence that pharmacy technicians can take on a range of roles including final accuracy checking, medicines management and pharmacy management in a controlled way and without increasing risk.”

She added that this contribution is pivotal to the future of pharmacy service provision, especially as pharmacists’ clinical role evolves. “As such, APTUK supports changes to supervision and greater delegation of tasks to pharmacy technicians as a registered professional within the pharmacy team. However, we believe that personal and organisational risk management must be in place and rigorously applied,” she continued.

Ms Fenn emphasised that pharmacy technicians “must recognise the limits of their competence and refer to a pharmacist when necessary”, and added “APTUK believes that within any proposed changes the presence of the pharmacist remains, along with overall accountability for the clinical appropriateness of medicines for patients.”

In response to the open letter, the RPS commented: “The Royal Pharmaceutical Society has always believed that a community pharmacy requires a pharmacist to be present,” adding that the Society invites “everyone in pharmacy to work with us to secure a bright future where pharmacists leading their teams in community pharmacies contribute fully to safe patient care.”

The wider picture

A Department of Health board was set up in 2013 to rebalance medicines legislation and pharmacy regulation including the decriminalision of dispensing errors, while also addressing pharmacy supervision.

Originally Published by Training Matters

Recommended

Exclusive interview: PSNC's Sue Sharpe

Is it time for dual supply and service contracting? Outgoing PSNC boss Sue Sharpe thinks it might be

Technicians supervising pharmacies would be "a betrayal"

Over 600 pharmacists have signed a letter to the RPS calling for it to oppose possible changes to supervison legislation

Popular

Patient safety in community pharmacy

This CPD module provides an overview of patient safety in community pharmacy.

Boys on board

The HPV vaccination programme could be extended to boys. But why now, where will it happen, and how will it work?

CPPE Foundation Pharmacist Programme Applications Now Open

The Foundation Pharmacist Programme is designed to support newly qualified pharmacists to develop their knowledge and sk...